Stuart Hall mentioned “Media appears to reflect reality
whilst in fact they construct it”. The relationship between collective identity
and media representation is not and will never be straightforward. The
statement is indeed true because we see that in today’s society they tend to
link youths with a moral panic especially since the London 2011 riots.
Our opinions are highly saturated by the media and their
representation of youths as a collective identity to be bad. Watching films
such as Kidulthood, directed by Noel Clarke conveys the messages that youths as
a collective identity are not governed are indeed lawless. Audiences may think
that Noel Clarke representation of youths was indeed accurate, showing youths
actually taking a delight in performing bad deeds, grinning whilst doing so. It
is not hard then for people to link youths with moral panic. Stuart hall
encoding/decoding states how the media gather information and represents it to
their audience. Looking back at 2011 London riots the daily mail newspaper
mentioned this of a group of youths “A sense of glee pervaded these accounts –
youths were often grinning while describing their experience – a delight that
the normal order of things was turned upside down.”
It does not then
come as a surprise that people would believe this to be an accurate portrayal
of youths and therefore start to believe further any information regarding
youths negatively. The press have a large impact on the views of youths,
especially tabloids, where they encode their own message within the media text
and the audience will then decode and deconstruct it in their own way according
to their lifestyle.
This is linked to Althusser’s interpellation theory, the
fact that it represents human subjects in this case youths are constructed by
pre-given structures. This has been taken up by the media in a form of
television, web 2.0, or tabloids/ broadsheets to impose their ideology on the
audiences. Thus if we think about it, were bombarded by messages from the
media, messages that make certain assumptions for us, and as soon as we engage
with the message we are positioned as a ‘subject’ rather than an individual.
The idea is that we are controlled y these messages and go some way to defining
our or anyone’s identity. In this case tabloids newspapers often exaggerate
to
the furthest degree as they class youths as not being govern and carless, using
words such as “brazen”, “thieves” and “yob” in their articles to impose their
ideology on others that youths need to be controlled or avoided altogether.
By doing this it creates a collective identity and not as
individuals. This can result in youths becoming angry and result in further
chaos as they cannot control what is said in the press, some may respond back appropriately
however others may respond back violently, as they may begin to label
themselves lawless and violent and therefore act in that accord.
Through the use of Web 2.0 such as:
· Facebook
· Twitter
We have been able to see that youths have been able to
use all this to form to that collective identity rather than an individual.
The guardian a broadsheet in fact represents youths
differently from that of a tabloid sheet. The guardian mentioned “just imagine
for a moment that you’re a British teenage boy. You’re struggling to grow up,
to find out who you really are?” which is in fact true as youths today are
trying to find their identity.
However because newspapers are generally given out to the
majority of lower class/ middle class citizens, who read tabloids rather than
broadsheets, youths in Britain are now classified with moral panic.
In conclusion, youths in the future will be labelled as
bad and dangerous by the mass media, films such as Shank, adulthood, fish tank
and the press will continue to contribute to this fact. Until, they are proven
to be viewed as having an identity individually instead of collectively by the
media, they will then continue to act the way they are.
This is MUCH, MUCH BETTER! A clear mid C.
ReplyDeleteWhat I would say is that your reflection on the past and present is NOT CLEAR. You must not 'bolt on' Shank - these could be easily compared to Kidulthood. You could even look at Adulthood. Great references to theories that are clear and also specific case studies.
THUS, HENCEFORTH, HENCE - These always come in the middle of a sentence.
WELL DONE :)